Filter Results: (29) Arrow Down

Desai, Mihir A.Remove Desai, Mihir A. →

Page 1 of 29 Results →

The Tulsa Massacre: Is Racial Justice Possible 100 Years Later?

by Michael Blanding

A new Harvard Business School case by Mihir Desai examines the Tulsa Massacre of 1921, and asks difficult questions about what reparations America owes to its Black citizens. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Can Historic Social Injustices be Addressed Through Reparations?

Re: Mihir A. Desai

Survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Massacre and their descendants believe historic social injustices should be addressed through reparations. Professor Mihir Desai discusses the arguments for and against reparations in response to the Tulsa Massacre and, more broadly, to the effects of slavery and racist government policies in the US in his case, “The Tulsa Massacre and the Call for Reparations.” Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Many Executives Are Afraid of Finance. Here's How They Can Gain Confidence

by Dina Gerdeman

Mihir Desai explains how managers can increase their understanding of how finance works. EXCERPT: Three valuation mistakes to avoid. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Think of it as Professors in Cars Having Coffee

by Sean Silverthorne

Has the art of civil debate returned? In the new Harvard Business School podcast series After Hours, professors Youngme Moon, Felix Oberholzer-Gee, and Mihir Desai discuss issues ranging from gun control to voice-activated digital assistants. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Tax Reform is on the Front Burner Again. Here’s Why You Should Care

by Sean Silverthorne

As debate begins around the Republican tax reform proposal, Mihir Desai and Matt Weinzierl discuss the first significant tax legislation in 30 years. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

What Jane Austen and Mel Brooks Can Teach Us About Finance

by Carmen Nobel

A new book by Mihir Desai links the fundamentals of finance to several centuries of literature, history, philosophy, music, visual arts, theater, and comedy to make the subject seem less mystifying—and more humanizing—to a broad audience of non-financiers. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Here’s How Businessman Trump Is Likely to Approach the Presidency

by Christina Pazzanese

Harvard Business School professors weigh in on how Donald Trump’s nearly 50 years of experience in building a global corporate empire (and zero years of political experience) might shape his approach to leading a nation. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

The 10 Most Popular 'Cold Call' Podcasts

Re: Multiple Faculty

As the year comes to a close, we revisit the Cold Call podcasts that attracted the most listeners in 2016. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Political Dysfunction Makes America Less Competitive

by Dina Gerdeman

The American economy is “failing the test of competitiveness," according to a new Harvard Business School study written by Michael E. Porter, Jan W. Rivkin, and Mihir A. Desai. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Behind Apple's Tax Situation, an Unprecedented Financial Policy

Re: Mihir A. Desai

The European Union recently hit Apple with a $14.5 billion tax bill, but that’s hardly the first or worst financial challenge the technology giant has faced. Mihir Desai explains the financial wiring behind the inventors of the iPhone. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Reform Tax Law to Keep US Firms at Home

by Mihir Desai

The flood of US corporations relocating to other countries is a hot topic in Congress. In recent testimony before the Senate Committee on Finance, Mihir Desai provided possible solutions around rethinking corporate tax and regulatory policy. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Should Pay-for-Performance Compensation be Replaced?

by James Heskett

Summing up: In spite of its naysayers, pay for performance compensation still makes sense to most of us, according to those responding to Jim Heskett's column on the subject. But there is a difference of opinion of about when and how it works and how it should be structured. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.

Trade Credit and Taxes

by Mihir A. Desai, C. Fritz Foley & James R. Hines

Economists have extensively analyzed the effects of taxation on many aspects of corporate financial policy, including borrowing and dividend distributions. But the effects of corporate income taxes on trade credit practices have been much less understood. Research by Mihir A. Desai, C. Fritz Foley, and James R. Hines, Jr. develops the idea that trade credit allows firms to reallocate capital in response to tax differences. Using detailed data on the foreign affiliates of US multinational firms, the authors are able to observe affiliates of the same firm operating in different countries and therefore facing different corporate income tax rates. Taken together, the findings illustrate that firms use trade credit to reallocate capital from low-tax jurisdictions to high tax jurisdictions to capitalize on tax-induced differences in pretax marginal products of capital. Their actions imply that tax rate differences across countries significantly affect capital allocation within firms, depressing investment levels in high tax jurisdictions and introducing differences between the productivity of capital deployed in different locations. Key concepts include: This paper examines the extent to which taxation influences trade credit practices by affecting returns to investment. Analysis of detailed foreign-affiliate-level data suggests that tax effects are large and statistically significant in explaining trade credit choices. Affiliates in low tax jurisdictions have higher net working capital positions than do other affiliates. Managers have incentives to set accounts receivable and accounts payable in a manner that reallocates capital from lightly taxed operations where investment opportunities have dissipated to highly taxed operations where profitable opportunities remain. This mechanism implies that net working capital positions, or the difference between accounts receivable and accounts payable, should be higher for firms facing lower tax rates. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.

Tax Policy and the Efficiency of US Direct Investment Abroad

by Mihir A. Desai, C. Fritz Foley & James R. Hines Jr.

The tax policy toward multinational firms has come under increased scrutiny with the rise of global activities of firms and concerns that these activities displace activities at home. This scrutiny has raised the question of whether current tax policy inefficiently subsidizes the foreign activities of firms. Mihir A. Desai, C. Fritz Foley, and James R. Hines, Jr. consider this claim by applying the theory of dynamic efficiency to the activities of multinational firms. Specifically, by comparing direct investment abroad with repatriated investment returns over the last sixty years, they conclude that firms are not investing to dynamically inefficient levels, suggesting that current tax policy is not an inefficient subsidy. Key concepts include: U.S. direct investment abroad generated cash flows greater than investment deployed by more than $1 trillion for equity investments from 1982-2010 annually, and $2 trillion for equity and debt investments from 1950-2010. The data suggest that US foreign investment is dynamically efficient. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.

Tax US Companies to Spur Spending

by Mihir A. Desai

With traditional monetary and fiscal policy instruments to stimulate the economy seemingly exhausted, professor Mihir Desai offers a radical proposal: Use taxes to motivate corporations to spend a trillion dollars in cash. Open for comment; 0 Comments.

Securing Jobs or the New Protectionism? Taxing the Overseas Activities of Multinational Firms

by Mihir A. Desai

Popular imagination often links two significant economic developments: the rapid escalation of the foreign activities of American multinational firms over the last 15 years, and rising levels of economic insecurity, particularly among workers in certain sectors. The presumed linkages between these phenomena have led many to call for a reconsideration of the tax treatment of foreign investment. Increasing the tax burden on outbound investment by American multinational firms, it is claimed, offers the promise of alleviating domestic employment losses and insecurity while also raising considerable revenue. HBS professor Mihir A. Desai looks beneath the trends, examining the economic determinants of outbound investment decisions and synthesizing what is known about the relationship between domestic and foreign activities. Key concepts include: There is no clear evidence of significant negative impacts on domestic investment or employment due to the overseas activities of firms. Foreign activity by multinational firms does not necessarily displace domestic economic activity. Other factors—such as falling prices of investment goods, and/or trade patterns—may have driven the employment changes that are so worrisome. When policymakers decide the appropriate taxation of multinational firms, they should resist the tempting logic of protectionism. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.

Where is Home for the Global Firm?

by Martha Lagace

Global markets are changing the relationship between firms and nation-states in important ways, says HBS professor Mihir A. Desai. His new working paper, "The Decentering of the Global Firm," offers a practical framework for business leaders to think strategically about where to locate their company's financial and legal homes, and managerial talent. Q&A with Desai. Key concepts include: Three critical aspects of a firm's national identity—its legal and financial home and its center for managerial talent—are increasingly distributed worldwide. There are benefits and costs to decentering, says Desai. The challenge for managers is to choose each home wisely. Firms that have left their traditional homebase include News Corporation, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Halliburton, and WPP Group, among others. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.

The Decentering of the Global Firm

by Mihir A. Desai

Firms such as Caterpillar are typically considered American companies by virtue of history while Honda, for example, is regarded as a Japanese company. However, the archetypal multinational firm with a particular national identity and a corporate headquarters fixed in one country is becoming obsolete as firms continue to maximize the opportunities created by global markets. The defining characteristics of what makes a firm belong to a country—where it is incorporated, where it is listed, the nationality of its investor base, the location of its headquarters functions—are no longer bound to one country. Why are these changes taking place, and what are their consequences? This paper places the increasing mobility of corporate identities within the broader setting of transformations to the "shape" of global firms over the last half century. Key concepts include: Responding strategically to these changes requires a reconceptualization of what a corporate home is. Managers will make conscious choices about how to unbundle activities that have traditionally been centered in a home country headquarters. Policymakers in countries around the world need to understand how to create attractive homes for firms, and researchers need to devise ways to incorporate these changes in their empirical and theoretical work. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.

Why the U.S. Should Encourage FDI

by Mihir A. Desai

American financial executives are courting foreign direct investors, particularly sovereign wealth funds, for new investments. Should these investments draw increased scrutiny from U.S. regulators? Harvard Business School professor Mihir Desai argues that most of these deals work out in America's best financial interest. Key concepts include: Foreign direct investors in the United States appear to systematically earn low returns on their investments in American corporate assets—less than what U.S. multinationals earn with their investments abroad. Rather than erecting barriers, America should be thanking foreign direct investors for investments that appear to be, on average, transferring wealth from abroad to the United States. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.

The Debate over Taxing Foreign Profits

by Sean Silverthorne

Corporate tax policy has suddenly become a hot topic in the U.S., including the issue of whether current tax laws encourage American firms to outsource jobs to other countries. Harvard Business School professor Mihir Desai makes a case for exempting foreign profit from taxes if proper safeguards are put in place. Key concepts include: The United States is increasingly an outlier in its taxation of corporate income earned on foreign soil. Critics argue the ability to defer U.S. taxation until profits are repatriated provides an incentive to ship jobs overseas. On the other hand, the current worldwide system is often derided as making American firms uncompetitive relative to their foreign competition. An alternative may be to exempt foreign income from taxes paired with safeguards against an overly aggressive use of tax havens. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.