Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    • Archive

    What You Can Learn From Your Stock Price - SURVEY - MASTERING MANAGEMENT: The secrets hidden in market prices

     
    4/23/2001
    HBS Professor Lisa Meulbroek describes an unfamiliar but important role financial markets can play for managers. Although managers have access to proprietary information about their own companies, they can extract important clues from market prices about the potential impact of competitors, suppliers, and the economy on their own bottom line.
    The Hidden Secrets in Market Prices

    Excerpted with permission from FT.com, Nov. 6, 2000. Copyright Lisa Meulbroek, 2000.

    Aggregating data
    The extent to which managers should rely on market prices depends upon the range and accuracy of that information. Because market prices represent the aggregation of many information sources, it is often difficult to determine exactly which pieces of information any single price reflects. Posed in terms of the dilemma faced by the managers in the pulp and paper concern, will spot and futures from pulp and paper markets reflect publicly-announced capital expenditure plans by their competitors? Will those prices also reflect the private expenditure plans of all competitors, whether announced or not?

    Quotation
    Ultimately, managers must make their own judgments about how much weight to give to the market. These will be based upon an understanding of what information market prices are likely to incorporate and how such information can be best extracted.
    Quotation
    —Lisa Meulbroek

    In general, market prices incorporate most public information and some private information. Private information comes from trading by informed market participants. These might include the managers themselves, who are permitted to trade (subject to insider trading restrictions) in both the US and the UK if they report such actions to regulators.

    Studies suggest that the amount of information in prices can be significant. More than that, even the most casual market observers will report that stock prices can move dramatically before news of mergers and other events becomes public. These sizeable pre-announcement movements further support the notion that prices incorporate private information.

    Market reactions
    Since market prices tend to reflect most public information, as well as some private information, the market reaction to a managerial decision has the potential to offer managers an informed assessment of that decision.

    Consider, for example, Quaker Oats' 1994 acquisition of Snapple Beverages. Quaker Oats, maker of Gatorade sports drink, announced its purchase of Snapple Beverages, a maker of fruit juices and iced teas, for $1.7 billion. After the announcement, Quaker Oats' stock price fell by 9.9 per cent, a drop amounting to more than $1 billion in Quaker's market value. The price did not rebound in subsequent trading.

    Quaker explained to analysts that it hoped to gain distribution and other synergies from buying Snapple. Quaker Oats distributed Gatorade through traditional supermarkets; Snapple distributed mostly through other stores. Quaker's managers expected each brand to bolster the other's weaker distribution channel.

    Quaker's attempts to explain these expected synergies did not change the market's response. Ultimately, Quaker's managers concluded that the market response was incorrect and stemmed from a misunderstanding of the distribution synergies to be gained. They moved ahead with the merger. Unfortunately, the expected synergies never materialized. Quaker later sold Snapple to Triarc Companies for $300 million, much less than its $1.7 billion purchase price.

    This example underscores both the potential value of the market's response to managers' decisions and the complexities managers face in interpreting that reaction. Managers who believe, after careful re-examination, that a fall in the stock price is unwarranted might choose to disclose information they believe has been overlooked by investors.

    Of course, concerns over proprietary information may sometimes limit such disclosures, making the loss in shareholder value a [presumably temporary] cost of maintaining secrecy. If prices fail to rebound even after additional information is released, as in the Quaker example, managers may want to reconsider their own assessment.

    Ultimately, managers must make their own judgments about how much weight to give to the market. These will be based upon an understanding of what information market prices are likely to incorporate and how such information can be best extracted. Ironically, one indication of the formidable nature of this task comes from the performance of financial asset managers. That these professional money managers as a group so seldom outperform the market suggests the difficulty in determining whether market prices already reflect the information upon which their investment decisions are based.

    In the end, however, the value of market information does not rest upon its ability to incorporate private information. Indeed, even if market prices reflected only publicly available information, managers would still have much to gain by using those prices. That is, as collectors and aggregators of information, market prices are a low-cost way for managers to estimate important variables, especially in areas unrelated to their managerial expertise.

    So, a manager needing an estimate of future inflation can extract that information from market prices of inflation-indexed treasury securities and conventional treasury bonds, rather than devote time to developing macroeconomic forecasting skills. Even the US Federal Reserve relies on such market "forecasts" when it uses the volatility implied by government bond option prices as an indicator of the degree of uncertainty about future interest rates.

    · · · ·

    See the Full Article

    Lisa Meulbroek, an Associate Professor, joined the finance faculty at the Harvard Business School in 1991, following a year as a Research Scholar in the Office of Economic Analysis at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    All images © Eyewire unless otherwise indicated.

    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College