Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Cold Call Podcast
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    • COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      Dangerous Expectations: Breaking Rules to Resolve Cognitive Dissonance
      26 Sep 2014Working Paper Summaries

      Dangerous Expectations: Breaking Rules to Resolve Cognitive Dissonance

      by Celia Moore, S. Wiley Wakeman and Francesca Gino
      Before completing a task, we form expectations about its difficulty and of how well we will perform on it. It is psychologically uncomfortable to perform worse than we expected. This paper proposes that individuals are more likely to break rules if they have been led to expect that achieving high levels of performance will be easy rather than difficult. The authors argue that this phenomenon occurs because of the heightened cognitive dissonance people experience when their performance expectations go unmet. Consistent with these arguments, across three studies people were more likely to break rules when have been led to believe that performing well will be easy rather than hard. The authors also show that differences in rule breaking are not due to differences in legitimate performance as a function of how easy people expect the task to be or whether their expectations are set explicitly (by referring to others' performance, Study 1) or implicitly (as implied by their own prior performance, Study 2). In Study 3, the authors also show that cognitive dissonance triggered by unmet expectations drives these effects. These results have important implications for the ways in which colleges are setting students' expectations, as well as broader implications for how we set expectations in professional environments. Key concepts include:
      • Academic and professional environments need to realistically manage how well their students and employees, respectively, should expect to perform.
      • When people experience a disconnect between their expectations and reality, they are more likely to engage in dysfunctional behaviors in the form of rule breaking, even when breaking rules means crossing ethical boundaries.
      LinkedIn
      Email

      Author Abstract

      When entering task performance contexts we generally have expectations about both the task and how well we will perform on it. When those expectations go unmet, we experience psychological discomfort (cognitive dissonance), which we are then motivated to resolve. Prior research on expectancy disconfirmation in task performance contexts has focused on the dysfunctional consequences of disconfirming low performance expectations (i.e., stereotype threat). In this paper we focus on the dysfunctional consequences of disconfirming high performance expectations. In three studies, we find that individuals are more likely to break rules if they have been led to expect that achieving high levels of performance will be easy rather than difficult, even if breaking rules means behaving unethically. We show that this willingness to break rules is not due to differences in legitimate performance as a function of how easy people expect the task to be, or whether their expectations are set explicitly (by referring to others' performance) or implicitly (as implied by their own prior performance). Instead, using a misattribution paradigm, we show that cognitive dissonance triggered by unmet expectations drives our effects.

      Paper Information

      • Full Working Paper Text
      • Working Paper Publication Date: August 2014
      • HBS Working Paper Number: 15-012
      • Faculty Unit(s): Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
          Trending
            • 29 Oct 2020
            • Research & Ideas

            The COVID Gender Gap: Why Fewer Women Are Dying

            • 13 Jul 2020
            • Research & Ideas

            Merck CEO Ken Frazier Discusses a COVID Cure, Racism, and Why Leaders Need to Walk the Talk

            • 11 Jan 2021
            • Research & Ideas

            Is A/B Testing Effective? Evidence from 35,000 Startups

            • 17 Feb 2020
            • Sharpening Your Skills

            How Entrepreneurs Can Find the Right Problem to Solve

            • 13 Jan 2021
            • Research & Ideas

            How 'Small C' Change Can Beat Large-Scale Rebuilding

        Francesca Gino
        Francesca Gino
        Tandon Family Professor of Business Administration
        Unit Head, Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
        Contact
        Send an email
        → More Articles
        Find Related Articles
        • Theory
        • Decision Making
        • Problems and Challenges

        Sign up for our weekly newsletter

        Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
        ǁ
        Campus Map
        Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
        Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
        Soldiers Field
        Boston, MA 02163
        Email: Editor-in-Chief
        →Map & Directions
        →More Contact Information
        • Make a Gift
        • Site Map
        • Jobs
        • Harvard University
        • Trademarks
        • Policies
        • Digital Accessibility
        Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College