Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Cold Call Podcast
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    • COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      Don’t Take ‘No’ for an Answer: An Experiment with Actual Organ Donor Registrations
      10 Sep 2014Working Paper Summaries

      Don’t Take ‘No’ for an Answer: An Experiment with Actual Organ Donor Registrations

      by Judd B. Kessler and Alvin E. Roth
      More than 10,000 people in the United States die each year while waiting for an organ transplant. Policymakers and some economists who have tried to increase the rates of organ transplantation have focused on changing the registration question—usually asked when people renew their driver's license—from a simple opt-in to one in which potential donors have the opportunity to make an active "yes" or "no " choice. The authors provide the first concrete evidence of whether active choice affects registration decisions about organ donation. Somewhat surprisingly, the results suggest that not only does active choice not increase registration, it may decrease the transplantation rate by suggesting to next-of-kin that unregistered donors actively chose not to donate. At the same time, however, experimental results suggest other ways to increase the rates of organ donor registration. For example, people are 22 times more likely to add themselves to the registry than remove themselves from the registry, even though they had been asked previously about organ donor registration. This suggests the effectiveness of making a repeated appeal for organ donor registration. In addition, giving people more information about organ donation increases registration rates. Key concepts include:
      • Giving people the opportunity to make an active choice about donation rather than a simple opt-in does not increase, and may decrease, organ donor registration rates.
      • Asking more than once for organ donation increases the number of donors. We shouldn't assume that "no" is a final answer (i.e., don't take no for an answer).
      • People who are registered donors are unlikely to remove themselves from the registry when given the opportunity to do so
      • Giving people information about the benefits of donation, namely providing a list of organs that might be donated, increases the likelihood of registration.
      • Increasing the number of individuals who register as deceased donors is just one way of addressing the need for transplantable organs. Kidney exchange, in which incompatible patient-donor pairs are matched, has facilitated transplantation of kidneys from living donors.
      LinkedIn
      Email

      Author Abstract

      Over 10,000 people in the U.S. die each year while waiting for an organ. Attempts to increase organ transplantation have focused on changing the registration question from an opt-in frame to an active choice frame. We analyze this change in California and show it decreased registration rates. Similarly, a "field in the lab" experiment run on actual organ donor registration decisions finds no increase in registrations resulting from an active choice frame. In addition, individuals are more likely to support donating the organs of a deceased who did not opt-in than one who said "no" in an active choice frame.

      Paper Information

      • Full Working Paper Text
      • Working Paper Publication Date: August 2014
      • HBS Working Paper Number: NBER 20378
      • Faculty Unit(s): Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
          Trending
            • 19 Jan 2021
            • In Practice

            Leadership Advice for Biden: Restore a Sense of Calm

            • 29 Oct 2020
            • Research & Ideas

            The COVID Gender Gap: Why Fewer Women Are Dying

            • 13 Jul 2020
            • Research & Ideas

            Merck CEO Ken Frazier Discusses a COVID Cure, Racism, and Why Leaders Need to Walk the Talk

            • 18 Jan 2021
            • Book

            How Thinking Like a Startup Helps Governments Solve More Problems

            • 25 Feb 2019
            • Research & Ideas

            How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

        Alvin E. Roth
        Alvin E. Roth
        George Gund Professor of Economics and Business Administration, Emeritus
        Contact
        Send an email
        → More Articles
        Find Related Articles
        • Theory
        • Health
        • Society
        • North & Central America
        • United States

        Sign up for our weekly newsletter

        Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
        ǁ
        Campus Map
        Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
        Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
        Soldiers Field
        Boston, MA 02163
        Email: Editor-in-Chief
        →Map & Directions
        →More Contact Information
        • Make a Gift
        • Site Map
        • Jobs
        • Harvard University
        • Trademarks
        • Policies
        • Digital Accessibility
        Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College