Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    Equity Concerns Are Narrowly Framed
    17 Nov 2017Working Paper Summaries

    Equity Concerns Are Narrowly Framed

    by Christine L. Exley and Judd B. Kessler
    This paper based on a large online study finds that individuals tend to differentiate in their concerns about fairness along specific dimensions, especially time and money, and are much more worried about fairness in one (time) than the other (money). These attitudes may help explain a seemingly wide variety of phenomena.
    LinkedIn
    Email

    Author Abstract

    What are individuals' preferences over the payoffs of others? We show that individuals aim to achieve equity but that they narrowly bracket their equity concerns. Rather than equalize overall budgets, individuals equalize the time component or money component of budgets. Individuals believe that achieving equity within these narrow brackets is more socially appropriate than achieving overall equity. Furthermore, individuals care more about achieving equity in time than equity in money. Narrow bracketing of equity concerns and more inequity aversion in time than in money persist when individuals make allocation choices between themselves and others. Our results can help explain a variety of behavioral phenomena including the structure of social insurance programs, patterns of public good provision, and why transactions that turn money into time are often deemed repugnant.

    Paper Information

    • Full Working Paper Text
    • Working Paper Publication Date: November 2017
    • HBS Working Paper Number: HBS Working Paper #18-040
    • Faculty Unit(s): Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
      Trending
        • 30 Jun 2022
        • HBS Case

        Peloton Changed the Exercise Game. Can the Company Push Through the Pain?

        • 13 Jun 2022
        • Research & Ideas

        Extroverts, Your Colleagues Wish You Would Just Shut Up and Listen

        • 23 Jun 2022
        • Research & Ideas

        All Those Zoom Meetings May Boost Connection and Curb Loneliness

        • 18 Apr 2022
        • HBS Case

        Dick’s Sporting Goods Followed Its Conscience on Guns—and It Paid Off

        • 22 Jun 2022
        • Book

        Four Elements for Finding the Right Career Path

    Christine L. Exley
    Christine L. Exley
    Marvin Bower Associate Professor
    Contact
    Send an email
    → More Articles
    Find Related Articles
    • Equality and Inequality
    • Fairness
    • Perception
    • Outcome or Result
    • Resource Allocation
    • Behavior

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter

    Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College