Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Cold Call Podcast
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    • COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      From Russia with Love: The Impact of Relocated Firms on Incumbent Survival
      14 Jul 2010Working Paper Summaries

      From Russia with Love: The Impact of Relocated Firms on Incumbent Survival

      by Oliver Falck, Christina Guenther, Stephan Heblich and William R. Kerr
      The relocation of the machine tool industry from the Soviet-occupied zone of postwar Germany to western regions is a unique laboratory for studying the impact of industrial structures on incumbent survival. Typically, geographic agglomerations of similar firms offer benefits to each member firm by reducing the transportation costs for material goods, specialized workers, and industry knowledge among the firms. Of course, tight geographic concentration comes with countervailing costs as firms compete for local inputs. In this paper, HBS professor William R. Kerr and coauthors study the impact of increased local concentration on incumbent firms by considering postwar Germany, when the fear of expropriation (or worse) in the wake of World War II prompted many machine tool firm owners to flee to western Germany, where they reestablished their firms. Key concepts include:
      • Relocations significantly increased the likelihood of incumbent failure, which suggests that the costs of increased competition for local inputs dominated the potential benefits from agglomeration economies.
      • By contrast, during the same postwar period, new start-up entrants—whose location choices were more opportunistic—were not associated with increased incumbent failure rates.
      • The increased failure rates of incumbents in western Germany due to relocating firms was concentrated in regions where labor forces were constrained due to low inflows of expellees from eastern Germany.
      • In regions with a significant inflow of expellees and favorable input conditions, there was no effect of relocations on incumbent firms' risk of failure.
      • The relocation of the machine tool industry from eastern to western Germany was substantial. In total, a fifth of the industry present in eastern Germany migrated during a narrow window of 1949-1956, representing an 8 percent increase in total industry size for the receiving zones.
      • These location choices were made under extreme duress, with little regard to existing business conditions across regions in western Germany.
      • Upon arrival, the relocating firms substantially impacted local industrial conditions as they quickly regained much of their former production capacity.
      LinkedIn
      Email

      Author Abstract

      We identify the impact of local firm concentration on incumbent performance with a quasi natural experiment. When Germany was divided after World War II, many firms in the machine tool industry fled the Soviet occupied zone to prevent expropriation. We show that the regional location decisions of these firms upon moving to western Germany were driven by non-economic factors and heuristics rather than existing industrial conditions. Relocating firms increased the likelihood of incumbent failure in destination regions, a pattern that differs sharply from new entrants. We further provide evidence that these effects are due to increased competition for local resources. Keywords: Agglomeration, competition, firm dynamics, labor, Germany. 36 pages

      Paper Information

      • Full Working Paper Text
      • Working Paper Publication Date: June 2010
      • HBS Working Paper Number: 10-112
      • Faculty Unit(s): Entrepreneurial Management
        Trending
          • 25 Feb 2019
          • Research & Ideas

          How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

          • 24 Oct 2016
          • Research & Ideas

          Bernie Madoff Explains Himself

          • 08 Mar 2021
          • In Practice

          COVID Killed the Traditional Workplace. What Should Companies Do Now?

          • 14 Apr 2021
          • Research & Ideas

          The High Cost of the Slow COVID Vaccine Rollout

          • 17 May 2017
          • Research & Ideas

          Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews

      William R. Kerr
      William R. Kerr
      Dimitri V. D'Arbeloff - MBA Class of 1955 Professor of Business Administration
      Unit Head, Entrepreneurial Management
      Contact
      Send an email
      → More Articles
      Find Related Articles
      • Strategy
      • Government and Politics
      • History
      • Manufacturing
      • Russia
      • Europe

      Sign up for our weekly newsletter

      Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
      ǁ
      Campus Map
      Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
      Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
      Soldiers Field
      Boston, MA 02163
      Email: Editor-in-Chief
      →Map & Directions
      →More Contact Information
      • Make a Gift
      • Site Map
      • Jobs
      • Harvard University
      • Trademarks
      • Policies
      • Digital Accessibility
      Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College