Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    How Centuries of Restrictions on Women Shed Light on Today's Abortion Debate
    Research & Ideas
    How Centuries of Restrictions on Women Shed Light on Today's Abortion Debate
    08 Nov 2022Research & Ideas

    How Centuries of Restrictions on Women Shed Light on Today's Abortion Debate

    by Kara Baskin
    08 Nov 2022| by Kara Baskin
    Going back to pre-industrial times, efforts to limit women's sexuality have had a simple motive: to keep them faithful to their spouses. Research by Anke Becker looks at the deep roots of these restrictions and their economic implications.
    LinkedIn
    Email

    Efforts to restrict women’s sexual behavior date back centuries in virtually every region of the world. Now, the end of Roe v. Wade in the United States has returned such limitations on women to the contemporary spotlight.

    Yet, the desire to restrict women appears to be about more than religion, education, or economic development, finds Harvard Business School Assistant Professor Anke Becker in a recent working paper called “On the Economic Origins of Restricting Women’s Promiscuity.”

    Her research investigates the origin of customs and norms, such as restrictions on women’s freedom of mobility, female genital cutting, and anti-abortion attitudes.

    Will women stray when men are away?

    Becker, who works at the intersection of anthropology and economics, finds evidence for the theory that such customs and were designed to keep women from straying. Her findings show that they originated in societies where men were away from home for extended periods to work and found it difficult to monitor the behavior of women, for example in societies that relied more on pastoralism rather than agriculture.

    In pre-industrial times, pastoralism was characterized by frequent (and often long) periods when husbands were absent from the home, making it difficult for them to monitor women’s behavior. Men were away for various reasons: taking animals out to pasture, protecting them against predators and thieves, or going to faraway markets to trade for agricultural products. This absence offered strong incentives to impose restrictions on women’s promiscuity.

    “The gender gaps in labor market participation, micro-entrepreneurship, or business ownership more generally seem to also partly reflect this social norm against women.”

    Becker uses historical data from the Ethnographic Atlas, an anthropological database of more than 1,200 pre-industrial societies, and links these historic conditions to modern data, such as the Standard Demographic and Health Surveys, which offer large-scale household survey data worldwide. These surveys elicit information about whether a woman has undergone infibulation, an invasive form of genital cutting that makes intercourse painful, and about how restricted she is in her freedom of movement. Becker also draws data from the World Values Survey, which examines values, beliefs, and moral attitudes in more than 100 countries, including stances on abortion.

    Women in pastoral societies face more restrictions

    All in all, Becker studied survey data from 100 countries covering more than 1.3 million people to see how historical conditions affect women’s freedoms today. Some of her key findings:

    • Among 205,000 people, respondents with greater pastoral ancestry exhibited stronger anti-abortion attitudes.
    • A larger sample of almost 700,000 women showed that women from historically pastoral ethnic groups faced more mobility restrictions.
    • Among almost 100,000 women in Africa, those who descend from more pastoral societies are more likely to have undergone infibulation, a particularly invasive form of female genital cutting.

    How restrictions on women are playing out

    Becker believes that her research has implications for women participating in the workforce. While some of those views may seem outdated, social pressure to keep women faithful still has lingering effects—with legal repercussions, such as the recent fall of Roe, and economic consequences. These views could shape beliefs about what women are permitted to achieve, holding them back in the workforce, Becker says. She currently investigates whether patterns in the workforce can be better understood in the light of her findings on restricting women’s promiscuity.

    Becker’s research shows that countries that historically relied more on pastoralism than agriculture have wider gender gaps in the workforce. For example, such countries have a smaller share of businesses owned by women.

    “Restricting women’s access to this important health care seems to be a means, at least partly, to disincentivize them from being promiscuous.”

    “The gender gaps in labor market participation, micro-entrepreneurship, or business ownership more generally seem to also partly reflect this social norm against women, a social norm that deems it inappropriate for women to interact with men outside of the family,” she says. Such norms, her research suggests, have very deep roots.

    Her research has poignancy also in light of the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Roe v. Wade ruling, which prevented abortion bans. It suggests that anti-abortion attitudes share the same functional origin with the custom of restricting women in their freedom of mobility and with particularly invasive forms of female genital cutting. Limits on women’s access to abortion—forcing them to continue an unwanted pregnancy—make extramarital sex riskier, she notes.

    “Restricting women’s access to this important health care seems to be a means, at least partly, to disincentivize them from being promiscuous, to make promiscuity riskier and more costly for women,” she says. “It seems to be about more than just a moral question of when life begins.”

    You Might Also Like:

    • How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence
    • Representation Matters: Building Case Studies That Empower Women Leaders
    • Will Demand for Women Executives Finally Shrink the Gender Pay Gap?

    Feedback or ideas to share? Email the Working Knowledge team at hbswk@hbs.edu.

    Image: Unsplash/Les Anderson

      Trending
        • 25 Jan 2022
        • Research & Ideas

        More Proof That Money Can Buy Happiness (or a Life with Less Stress)

        • 25 Feb 2019
        • Research & Ideas

        How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

        • 14 Mar 2023
        • In Practice

        What Does the Failure of Silicon Valley Bank Say About the State of Finance?

        • 17 May 2017
        • Research & Ideas

        Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews

        • 15 Nov 2022
        • Book

        Stop Ignoring Bad Behavior: 6 Tips for Better Ethics at Work

    Anke Becker
    Anke Becker
    Assistant Professor of Business Administration
    Contact
    Send an email
    → More Articles
    Find Related Articles
    • Values and Beliefs
    • Social Issues
    • Gender

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter

    Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College