Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    Learning Tradeoffs in Organizations: Measuring Multiple Dimensions of Improvement to Investigate Learning-Curve Heterogeneity
    05 Jul 2006Working Paper Summaries

    Learning Tradeoffs in Organizations: Measuring Multiple Dimensions of Improvement to Investigate Learning-Curve Heterogeneity

    by Francesca Gino, Richard M.J. Bohmer, Amy C. Edmondson, Gary P. Pisano and Ann B. Winslow
    How and why experience leads to performance improvement has made the learning curve an important management topic for sites ranging from nuclear power plants to cardiac surgical units. This new research looks deeper at learning curves by focusing on learning rates in technology adoption in similar organizations along multiple, potentially competing dimensions. Using longitudinal data from sixteen hospitals that are adopting a new technology for cardiac surgery, it specifically studies two dimensions: efficiency and application innovation and the potential tradeoff between efficiency and application innovation. It also asks how such tradeoffs are influenced. Key concepts include:
    • Organizations should explicitly decide which dimension of learning is of greatest strategic importance to them.
    • Some organizations may learn more slowly on a particular dimension because they are investing in a different, potentially contradictory dimension of learning.
    • Hospitals in the study that focused on increasing the technical difficulty and innovativeness of their use of a new technology were less likely to increase efficiency as quickly as those that were focused on efficiency.
    LinkedIn
    Email

    Author Abstract

    Learning-curve research has found that rates of learning can vary across similar settings, such that cumulative experience is a necessary but insufficient predictor of learning-curve slope. One explanation for this finding is that how the learning process is managed affects rates of learning. We investigate an additional possibility. At any point in time, organizations can learn along multiple, potentially competing, performance dimensions. In particular, we suggest that organizations adopting a new technology or practice can "learn" on more than one dimension at the same time, such that more than one meaningful learning curve may exist for the same learning challenge. Thus, by arguing that effort invested in learning on one dimension may inhibit learning on another dimension, we propose a new explanation of learning-curve heterogeneity across organizations. Using a sample of sixteen academic and community hospitals adopting a new surgical technology, we demonstrate a tradeoff in organizational rates of learning on two dimensions: improving proficiency in an existing application use of the technology (efficiency) and applying the technology to novel and more challenging uses (application innovation). Our results provide support for our proposed explanation of learning-curve heterogeneity and suggest the salience of both rate and direction (i.e., dimension) in learning. We also find that the goal orientation of the organization influences the direction of learning (efficiency vs. application innovation).

    Paper Information

    • Full Working Paper Text
    • Working Paper Publication Date: January 2005, revised May 2006
    • HBS Working Paper Number: 05-047
    • Faculty Unit(s): Technology and Operations Management
      Trending
        • 27 Jan 2023
        • Op-Ed

        Have We Lost Sight of Integrity?

        • 01 Feb 2023
        • What Do You Think?

        Will Hybrid Work Strategies Pull Down Long-Term Performance?

        • 31 Jan 2023
        • Research & Ideas

        It’s Not All About Pay: College Grads Want Jobs That ‘Change the World’

        • 17 Jan 2023
        • In Practice

        8 Trends to Watch in 2023

        • 28 Feb 2018
        • Sharpening Your Skills

        Master the Team Meeting

    Amy C. Edmondson
    Amy C. Edmondson
    Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management
    Contact
    Send an email
    → More Articles
    Gary P. Pisano
    Gary P. Pisano
    Harry E. Figgie, Jr. Professor of Business Administration
    Senior Associate Dean for Faculty Promotions and Tenure
    Contact
    Send an email
    → More Articles
    Find Related Articles
    • Organizations
    • Health
    • Innovation and Invention
    • Health

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter

    Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College