Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Cold Call Podcast
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    • COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      Learning Tradeoffs in Organizations: Measuring Multiple Dimensions of Improvement to Investigate Learning-Curve Heterogeneity
      05 Jul 2006Working Paper Summaries

      Learning Tradeoffs in Organizations: Measuring Multiple Dimensions of Improvement to Investigate Learning-Curve Heterogeneity

      by Francesca Gino, Richard M.J. Bohmer, Amy C. Edmondson, Gary P. Pisano and Ann B. Winslow
      How and why experience leads to performance improvement has made the learning curve an important management topic for sites ranging from nuclear power plants to cardiac surgical units. This new research looks deeper at learning curves by focusing on learning rates in technology adoption in similar organizations along multiple, potentially competing dimensions. Using longitudinal data from sixteen hospitals that are adopting a new technology for cardiac surgery, it specifically studies two dimensions: efficiency and application innovation and the potential tradeoff between efficiency and application innovation. It also asks how such tradeoffs are influenced. Key concepts include:
      • Organizations should explicitly decide which dimension of learning is of greatest strategic importance to them.
      • Some organizations may learn more slowly on a particular dimension because they are investing in a different, potentially contradictory dimension of learning.
      • Hospitals in the study that focused on increasing the technical difficulty and innovativeness of their use of a new technology were less likely to increase efficiency as quickly as those that were focused on efficiency.
      LinkedIn
      Email

      Author Abstract

      Learning-curve research has found that rates of learning can vary across similar settings, such that cumulative experience is a necessary but insufficient predictor of learning-curve slope. One explanation for this finding is that how the learning process is managed affects rates of learning. We investigate an additional possibility. At any point in time, organizations can learn along multiple, potentially competing, performance dimensions. In particular, we suggest that organizations adopting a new technology or practice can "learn" on more than one dimension at the same time, such that more than one meaningful learning curve may exist for the same learning challenge. Thus, by arguing that effort invested in learning on one dimension may inhibit learning on another dimension, we propose a new explanation of learning-curve heterogeneity across organizations. Using a sample of sixteen academic and community hospitals adopting a new surgical technology, we demonstrate a tradeoff in organizational rates of learning on two dimensions: improving proficiency in an existing application use of the technology (efficiency) and applying the technology to novel and more challenging uses (application innovation). Our results provide support for our proposed explanation of learning-curve heterogeneity and suggest the salience of both rate and direction (i.e., dimension) in learning. We also find that the goal orientation of the organization influences the direction of learning (efficiency vs. application innovation).

      Paper Information

      • Full Working Paper Text
      • Working Paper Publication Date: January 2005, revised May 2006
      • HBS Working Paper Number: 05-047
      • Faculty Unit(s): Technology and Operations Management
          Trending
            • 29 Oct 2020
            • Research & Ideas

            The COVID Gender Gap: Why Fewer Women Are Dying

            • 13 Jul 2020
            • Research & Ideas

            Merck CEO Ken Frazier Discusses a COVID Cure, Racism, and Why Leaders Need to Walk the Talk

            • 25 Feb 2019
            • Research & Ideas

            How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

            • 19 Jan 2021
            • In Practice

            Leadership Advice for Biden: Restore a Sense of Calm

            • 01 Nov 2020
            • Research & Ideas

            Good Leadership Is an Act of Kindness

        Amy C. Edmondson
        Amy C. Edmondson
        Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management
        Contact
        Send an email
        → More Articles
        Gary P. Pisano
        Gary P. Pisano
        Harry E. Figgie, Jr. Professor of Business Administration
        Senior Associate Dean for Faculty Development
        Contact
        Send an email
        → More Articles
        Find Related Articles
        • Organizations
        • Health
        • Innovation and Invention
        • Health

        Sign up for our weekly newsletter

        Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
        ǁ
        Campus Map
        Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
        Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
        Soldiers Field
        Boston, MA 02163
        Email: Editor-in-Chief
        →Map & Directions
        →More Contact Information
        • Make a Gift
        • Site Map
        • Jobs
        • Harvard University
        • Trademarks
        • Policies
        • Digital Accessibility
        Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College