Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    Return on Political Investment in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
    30 Dec 2014Working Paper Summaries

    Return on Political Investment in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004

    by Hui Chen, Katherine Gunny and Karthik Ramanna
    There is a widespread assumption that corporate political spending is highly profitable, earning well more than what would be expected in a competitive market. However, in the popular press and even in previous scholarship most of the returns cited as evidence for this phenomenon are based on descriptive research rather than empirical studies. What are the real economic returns of corporate political spending? Here the authors apply a more rigorous approach for a clearly delimited time period by examining the returns to corporate political spending on what became the American Jobs Creation Act ("the AJCA") of 2004. Findings differ sharply from those generated in prior studies. Specifically, for the median politically active firm in the sample 1) an increase in $1 million in lobbying expenditures is associated with about $32.35 million in taxes saved; 2) an increase in $100,000 of PAC contributions is associated with about $15.64 million in taxes saved; and 3) the additional filing of ten tax-related lobbying reports is associated with about $21.08 million in taxes saved. These results are particularly relevant in light of continued corporate attempts to generate support in the Congress for another "one-time" tax break on repatriated foreign income in line with the AJCA of 2004. Overall, the study suggests that the very high returns to political investment heralded in the press - obtained through descriptive methods - are, in fact, nearly an order of magnitude smaller when more rigorously estimated via instrumentation. Key concepts include:
    • Prior research has shown that firms generally use three different methods of political spending in complement with one another. It is thus more meaningful to consider three return estimates jointly.
    • In this current paper, for the median firm in the sample an increase of $1 million in lobbying contributions (over the firm's prior cycle contributions) is associated with $32.35 million in taxes saved on repatriated foreign income.
    • An increase of $100,000 in PAC (political action committee) contributions is associated with about $15.64 million in taxes saved.
    • The additional filing of ten tax-related lobbying reports is associated with about $21.08 million in taxes saved.
    LinkedIn
    Email

    Author Abstract

    Prior literature raises a "puzzle" of high rates of return on corporate political investment, but evidence for this puzzle is largely descriptive in nature. We exploit the setting of the American Jobs Creation Act's passage in 2004 to provide more robust estimates of political returns based on instrumentation in a two-stage regression model. We find for the median sample firm that an increase of $1 million in lobbying spending is associated with about $32.35 million in taxes saved. These estimates, while consistent with a high-returns "puzzle," are nearly an order of magnitude lower than those previously reported via descriptive methods.

    Paper Information

    • Full Working Paper Text
    • Working Paper Publication Date: December 2014
    • HBS Working Paper Number: 15-050
    • Faculty Unit(s): Accounting and Management
      Trending
        • 25 Jan 2022
        • Research & Ideas

        More Proof That Money Can Buy Happiness (or a Life with Less Stress)

        • 25 Feb 2019
        • Research & Ideas

        How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

        • 14 Mar 2023
        • In Practice

        What Does the Failure of Silicon Valley Bank Say About the State of Finance?

        • 17 May 2017
        • Research & Ideas

        Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews

        • 15 Nov 2022
        • Book

        Stop Ignoring Bad Behavior: 6 Tips for Better Ethics at Work

    Find Related Articles
    • Government and Politics
    • Finance
    • North & Central America
    • United States

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter

    Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College