Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    The Dark Side of Performance Bonuses
    09 Apr 2018Sharpening Your Skills

    The Dark Side of Performance Bonuses

    by Sean Silverthorne
    To motivate workers, employers often turn to incentives such as money or recognition. What's become clear is that these programs can also result in unintended consequences—like a financial crisis.
    LinkedIn
    Email
    iPhoto

    Companies continually test ways to incent employees to perform more effectively, often turning to worker-motivation tools such as bonuses, “up or out” employee ranking tournaments, and employee of the month rewards.

    Behavioral scientists warn that these programs, if not constructed carefully, can open a box full of unintended consequences that ultimately harm rather than help the organization.

    The financial crisis of 2008 was partially fueled by origination bonuses paid to bank loan officers who were incented to approve bad loans. Less well understood, but uncovered in HBS research several years ago, is that those bank bonuses also caused loan officers to perceive reality differently—they believed those loans would succeed.

    It’s not just financial incentives that are under study. Employers seek to change the behavior of workers in all manner of ways: to make more ethical decisions, to get flu shots, to lose weight, to be wiser about personal financial planning. Behavioral scientists are becoming the new HR superstars in some organizations.

    Research through the years at Harvard Business School has explored this good intentions-bad outcomes dilemma in many settings, from the glitzy world of Las Vegas to steamy laundry plants in Asia. The results these studies have uncovered are important to understand for org designers, compensation committees, and any function such as sales that depends on incentives to drive performance.

    Here is a sample of research from HBS into the dark side of employee motivation programs:

    When Good Incentives Lead to Bad Decisions

    Leading up to the financial crisis, bank loan officers were often incentivized to approve sketchy applications. But researchers discovered the incentives did more than motivate underwriting of bad loans; they changed how those loan officers perceived reality.

    The Most Powerful Workplace Motivator

    Money isn’t always the most powerful work motivator. In this field experiment participants were willing to pay money to be ranked higher. Why?

    How to Demotivate Your Best Employees

    Do awards such as "employee of the month" motivate higher performance? Not really—and they may turn off your best employees altogether.

    Altruistic Capital: Harnessing Your Employees’ Intrinsic Goodwill

    Everyone comes to the table with some amount of "altruistic capital," a stock of intrinsic desire to serve. This field research studies what motivates hairdressers in Zambia to provide HIV/AIDS education in their salons.

    Is Group Loyalty a Force for Good or Evil?

    Many organizations try to foster employee loyalty, but at a risk. Researchers discover when group loyalty fosters ethical behavior—and when it fosters corruption.

    The Importance of ‘Don’t’ in Inducing Ethical Employee Behavior

    Let’s say your company’s reputation depends upon the ethical behavior of your staff. To encourage that value in employees, is it better to promote good deeds or prevent bad deeds? It turns out that employees tend to act more ethically when focused on what not to do.

    Should Pay-for-Performance Compensation Be Replaced?

    In spite of its naysayers, pay-for-performance compensation still makes sense to most of us. But there is a difference of opinion about when and how it works and how it should be structured.

    Money and Quotas Motivate the Sales Force Best

    Bonus programs are effective for motivating sales people, but also costly for companies to maintain. Which compensation schemes work best?

    If the CEO’s High Salary Isn't Justified to Employees, Firm Performance May Suffer

    Rank-and-file employees understand the boss deserves a big salary, but only when the number is fully explained.

    Research Papers

    Driven by Social Comparisons: How Feedback about Coworkers’ Effort Influences Individual Productivity

    At a Japanese bank, researchers examine the extent to which job performance is affected when employees learn where they stand relative to their coworkers. Does telling an employee that her job performance falls in the bottom of her group better her performance?

    CEO Bonus Plans: And How to Fix Them

    While compensation committees know how much they pay in bonuses and are generally aware of performance measures used in CEO bonus plans, relatively little attention is paid to the design of the bonus plan or unintended consequences.

    Equality and Equity in Compensation

    Why do some firms such as technology startups offer the same equity compensation packages to all new employees despite very different cash salaries? Researchers present evidence that workers dislike inequality in equity compensation more than salary compensation because of the perceived scarcity of equity.

    Subjectivity in Tournaments: Implicit Rewards and Penalties and Subsequent Performance

    Employees can be more motivated by the anticipation of a reward or punishment than the actual payoff.

    What do you think of this research?

    Have you seen incentive programs that incented the wrong behavior? Give us your insights below.

    Post A Comment
    In order to be published, comments must be on-topic and civil in tone, with no name calling or personal attacks. Your comment may be edited for clarity and length.
      Trending
        • 25 Jan 2022
        • Research & Ideas

        More Proof That Money Can Buy Happiness (or a Life with Less Stress)

        • 25 Feb 2019
        • Research & Ideas

        How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

        • 14 Mar 2023
        • In Practice

        What Does the Failure of Silicon Valley Bank Say About the State of Finance?

        • 17 May 2017
        • Research & Ideas

        Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews

        • 15 Nov 2022
        • Book

        Stop Ignoring Bad Behavior: 6 Tips for Better Ethics at Work

    Find Related Articles
    • Motivation and Incentives
    • Human Resources
    • Performance Improvement

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter

    Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College