Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcasts
  • About Us
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Cold Call Podcast
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    • COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      COVID-19 Business Impact Center
      The Effect of Market Leadership in Business Process Innovation: The Case(s) of E-Business Adoption
      04 Aug 2010Working Paper Summaries

      The Effect of Market Leadership in Business Process Innovation: The Case(s) of E-Business Adoption

      by Kristina McElheran
      The connection between market leadership and the adoption of new technologies is central to understanding how firms maintain or gain competitive advantage over time. One key determinant of firm openness to either product or process innovation is how radical or incremental a particular change is for the organization. Using the context of IT-enabled business processes for e-buying and e-selling, a setting that offers a complementary view to studies that have focused on R&D expenditure and patents as measures of innovation, HBS professor Kristina McElheran sheds light on whether, when, and why market leaders might be more likely to adopt new innovations. This study represents the first robust, multi-industry evidence that market leaders are far more likely to adopt incremental rather than radical business process innovations. Key concepts include:
      • Extensive survey data for 1999 show that e-buying constituted a relatively incremental process innovation, while e-selling was far more radical.
      • Market leaders were more likely than laggards to adopt incremental business process innovations. External market factors and internal characteristics reinforced each other to make adoption relatively more beneficial and/or easier for the largest, most successful firms.
      • Market leaders were less likely than laggards to adopt radical business process innovations. For the complex, strategically sensitive activity of e-selling, market leaders faced disproportionate risks and adjustment costs, making adoption less attractive for firms with the largest market shares.
      • The combination of complexity, strategic sensitivity, and boundary-spanning created the particular challenge observed for market leaders in the case of e-selling and potentially other business process innovations.
      • Inter-firm coordination is an important strategic consideration as businesses grow ever more dependent on the performance of their extended value chain for success. Lagging firms may discover new opportunities to leapfrog their larger competitors using certain business-to-business process innovations and IT-enabled supply chain relationships.
      LinkedIn
      Email

      Author Abstract

      This paper investigates the relationship between market position and the adoption of IT-enabled process innovations. Prior research has focused overwhelmingly on product innovation and garnered mixed empirical support. I extend the literature into the understudied area of business process innovation, developing a framework for classifying innovations based on the complexity, interdependence, and customer impact of the underlying business process. I test the framework's predictions in the context of e-buying and e-selling adoption. Leveraging detailed U. Census data, I find robust evidence that market leaders were significantly more likely to adopt the incremental innovation of e-buying but commensurately less likely to adopt the more radical practice of e-selling. The findings highlight the strategic significance of adjustment costs and co-invention capabilities in technology adoption, particularly as businesses grow more dependent on new technologies for their operational and competitive performance.

      Paper Information

      • Full Working Paper Text
      • Working Paper Publication Date: June 2010 (Revised April 2011)
      • HBS Working Paper Number: 10-104
      • Faculty Unit(s): Technology and Operations Management
        Trending
          • 24 Feb 2021
          • Lessons from the Classroom

          What History's Biggest Wars Teach Us About Leading in Peace

          • 25 Feb 2019
          • Research & Ideas

          How Gender Stereotypes Kill a Woman’s Self-Confidence

          • 17 May 2017
          • Research & Ideas

          Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews

          • 13 Jul 2020
          • Research & Ideas

          Merck CEO Ken Frazier Discusses a COVID Cure, Racism, and Why Leaders Need to Walk the Talk

          • 09 Feb 2021
          • Cold Call Podcast

          Developing Resilience on the Path to Becoming a CEO

      Find Related Articles
      • Innovation and Invention
      • Strategy
      • Internet
      • Technology

      Sign up for our weekly newsletter

      Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
      ǁ
      Campus Map
      Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
      Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
      Soldiers Field
      Boston, MA 02163
      Email: Editor-in-Chief
      →Map & Directions
      →More Contact Information
      • Make a Gift
      • Site Map
      • Jobs
      • Harvard University
      • Trademarks
      • Policies
      • Digital Accessibility
      Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College