Video directed and produced by Joanie Tobin
Conventional wisdom says that money can't buy happiness. Behavioral science begs to differ. In fact, research shows that money can make us happier—but only if we spend it in particular ways.
In their book Happy Money: The Science of Smarter Spending, authors Elizabeth Dunn and Michael Norton draw on years of quantitative and qualitative research to explain how we can turn cash into contentment.
The key lies in adhering to five key principles: Buy Experiences (research shows that material purchases are less satisfying than vacations or concerts); Make it a Treat (limiting access to our favorite things will make us keep appreciating them); Buy Time (focusing on time over money yields wiser purchases); Pay Now, Consume Later (delayed consumption leads to increased enjoyment); and Invest in Others (spending money on other people makes us happier than spending it on ourselves).
In the following video, the first in a series, Norton doles out some cash to two women in Harvard Square on a sunny summer day. The catch: Each of them must take the money and spend it on an experience.
"One of the most common things people do with their money is get stuff," explains Norton, an associate professor of marketing at Harvard Business School. "But we have shown…in research that stuff isn't good for you. It doesn't make you unhappy, but it doesn't make you happy. But one thing that does make us happy is an experience."
Watch the video to find out why Norton believes that taking a trip yields more happiness than, say, buying a necklace—and to find out whether the women in Harvard Square end up happier.
See the companion video, To Buy Happiness, Purchase an Experience.
Running the risk of putting words in his mouth, the principle is as follows:
1) We spend orders of magnitudes more time experiencing something than we do remembering how that experience made us feel (which may or may not actually tie back to the reality of the experience itself)
2) By living in the moment and focusing on experiences vs. living in the past and recalling how experiences made you feel or living in the future and worring how future experiences will end up, you maximize happiness
When you extend the Kahneman insight by bifurcating "experiences" into broad (multi-faceted, complex life adventures) vs. narrow (one-dimensional, limited usage of stuff) and you'll see the connection that I'm drawing between Kahneman's theory and the ideas summarized in this post.
Put simply: an "experience" is chaotic and unpredictable that can bare unexpected self-propagating fruit whereas buying "stuff" is known and uninspiring.
Janet
From my hands on experience, I would tend to agree with the findings. A reward such as a football or rugby game (experience) at prime seat (scarcity) where tickets difficult to get and you can also bring your kids to (spend on others on a future date) is indeed most desirable
Of course, a reward shall ideally be related to the underlying product you are selling too
In my view making the best of the present without brooding on the past or worrying about the future is the best treatment for remaining happy.
All my working life, I have advised the customers that it is the experience from the product which makes it far apart from the others. Same same but different.
Holiday experience can mentally fade away, but product experience is nurtured every single day of its usage.
Happiness is a product of quality of thoughts, not purchases.
To celebrate the Holidays, I ceased buying things and began purchasing experiences for my three nephews and me to do together. The 'certificate' of the experience is given at a dinner where just my nephews (now ages 30-44) and their spouse/significant other comes for dinner. Post entree, pre dessert, the drum rolls and they all open the certificate at once.
Because we are located in different cities, we come together over July 4th to enjoy each other again and experience the happiness Aunt Stephanie bought.
As I read the article about the five principles, mentally I said, check. check, check, check, and check! All true!
So yes, Harvard, it is true. Next time, just call me!