Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
    • Working Paper Summaries
  • Browse All
    Updating the Balanced Scorecard for Triple Bottom Line Strategies
    20 Sep 2020Working Paper Summaries

    Updating the Balanced Scorecard for Triple Bottom Line Strategies

    by Robert S. Kaplan and David McMillan
    Society increasingly expects businesses to help solve problems of environmental degradation, inequality, and poverty. This paper explains how the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Map should be modified to reflect businesses’ expanded role for society.
    LinkedIn
    Email

    Author Abstract

    Many companies are now attempting to achieve triple bottom line performance on financial, environmental, and societal metrics. Successful strategies for such performance, however, generally require new relationships among multiple players in multiple sectors across a company’s supply chain for products and talent. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC), originally developed to describe and implement a single organization’s strategy, needs to be adapted to reflect such multi-stakeholder strategies for triple bottom line performance. The Financial perspective is replaced by “Outcomes” to encompass financial, environmental, and societal metrics; Customer becomes “Stakeholders” to reflect the interests of the multiple participants in the ecosystem; and Learning & Growth becomes “Enablers” to include the new capabilities for collaboration and alignment. The paper motivates and illustrates the new framework with examples from innovative agribusiness ecosystems.

    Paper Information

    • Full Working Paper Text
    • Working Paper Publication Date: August 2020
    • HBS Working Paper Number: HBS Working Paper 21-028
    • Faculty Unit(s): Accounting and Management
      Trending
        • 24 Jan 2023
        • Research & Ideas

        Passion at Work Is a Good Thing—But Only If Bosses Know How to Manage It

        • 17 Jan 2023
        • In Practice

        8 Trends to Watch in 2023

        • 19 Jan 2023
        • Research & Ideas

        What Makes Employees Trust (vs. Second-Guess) AI?

        • 25 Jan 2022
        • Research & Ideas

        More Proof That Money Can Buy Happiness (or a Life with Less Stress)

        • 10 Jan 2023
        • Research & Ideas

        How to Live Happier in 2023: Diversify Your Social Circle

    Find Related Articles
    • Balanced Scorecard
    • Strategy
    • Environmental Sustainability
    • Integrated Corporate Reporting
    • Growth and Development
    • Accounting

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter

    Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College