Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Working Knowledge
Business Research for Business Leaders
  • Browse All Articles
  • Popular Articles
  • Cold Call Podcast
  • Managing the Future of Work Podcast
  • About Us
  • Book
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Entrepreneurship
  • All Topics...
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • Globalization
    • Leadership
    • Management
    • Negotiation
    • Social Enterprise
    • Strategy
  • Sections
    • Book
    • Podcasts
    • HBS Case
    • In Practice
    • Lessons from the Classroom
    • Op-Ed
    • Research & Ideas
    • Research Event
    • Sharpening Your Skills
    • What Do You Think?
  • Browse All
    Using What We Know: Turning Organizational Knowledge into Team Performance
    06 Oct 2010Working Paper Summaries

    Using What We Know: Turning Organizational Knowledge into Team Performance

    by Bradley R. Staats, Melissa A. Valentine and Amy C. Edmondson
    An organization's captured (and codified) knowledge--white papers, case studies, documented processes--should help project teams perform better, but does it? Existing research has not answered the question, even as U.S. companies alone spend billions annually on knowledge management programs. Looking at large-scale, objective data from Indian software developer Wipro, researchers Bradley R. Staats, Melissa A. Valentine, and Amy C. Edmondson found that team use of an organization's captured knowledge enhanced productivity, especially for teams that were geographically diverse, relatively low in experience, or performing complex work. The study did not find effects of knowledge use on the quality of the team's work, except for dispersed teams. Key concepts include:
    • Using captured knowledge had a positive effect on the team's project efficiency (delivering on budget) but not on project quality (number of defects in the code).
    • When use of knowledge was concentrated in a small number of team members, efficiency improved but quality declined.
    • Knowledge use improved project efficiency but not quality for teams with less experience.
    • For more dispersed teams, knowledge use was related to improved quality but not efficiency.
    • Team knowledge use was related to improved efficiency and quality for teams completing more complex work.
    LinkedIn
    Email

    Author Abstract

    This paper examines when and how project teams' use of knowledge previously codified and stored in the organization affects team performance. We draw upon the team effectiveness, knowledge management, and information systems literatures to develop five hypotheses on the effects of team knowledge use on two measures of team performance (quality and efficiency), based on structural characteristics of the task and team. We also distinguish between a team's mean use of stored knowledge and the concentration of knowledge use in a team. Using objective data from several hundred software development projects in an Indian software services firm, we find that mean team knowledge use has a positive effect on project efficiency but not on project quality. Team concentration of use is also associated with project efficiency but, in contrast to mean use, is related to lower project quality. As predicted, we also find that mean team use is more positively related to performance when teams are dispersed geographically, have less human capital, or are faced with particularly complex tasks. Our findings offer insight for theory and practice into how accessing stored organizational knowledge can improve knowledge workers' productivity and help build organizational capability.

    Paper Information

    • Full Working Paper Text
    • Working Paper Publication Date: August, 2010
    • HBS Working Paper Number: 11-031
    • Faculty Unit(s): Technology and Operations Management
      Trending
        • 19 Sep 2023
        • HBS Case

        How Will the Tech Titans Behind ChatGPT, Bard, and LLaMA Make Money?

        • 05 Sep 2023
        • Research & Ideas

        Failing Well: How Your ‘Intelligent Failure’ Unlocks Your Full Potential

        • 12 Sep 2023
        • Book

        Successful, But Still Feel Empty? A Happiness Scholar and Oprah Have Advice for You

        • 28 Aug 2023
        • Research & Ideas

        How Workplace Wellness Programs Can Give Employees the Energy Boost They Need

        • 15 Aug 2023
        • Cold Call Podcast

        Ryan Serhant: How to Manage Your Time for Happiness

    Amy C. Edmondson
    Amy C. Edmondson
    Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management
    Contact
    Send an email
    → More Articles
    Find Related Articles
    • Organizational Design
    • Information Management
    • Knowledge Management
    • Video Game
    • Web Services
    • India

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter

    Interested in improving your business? Learn about fresh research and ideas from Harvard Business School faculty.
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
    ǁ
    Campus Map
    Harvard Business School Working Knowledge
    Baker Library | Bloomberg Center
    Soldiers Field
    Boston, MA 02163
    Email: Editor-in-Chief
    →Map & Directions
    →More Contact Information
    • Make a Gift
    • Site Map
    • Jobs
    • Harvard University
    • Trademarks
    • Policies
    • Accessibility
    • Digital Accessibility
    Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College